I am Justin Shubow

President of the National Civic Art Society, a non-profit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. that promotes the classical and humanistic tradition in public art and architecture. Eleventh Chairman of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, an independent federal agency comprising seven presidential appointees who are the aesthetic guardians of Washington.

Lecturing on Citizenship and Public Architecture at First Things Magazine

On August 9, 2024, I had the pleasure of giving a talk on “Citizenship and Public Architecture” at First Things magazine’s intellectual retreat at the Union League Club in New York City. To quote:

[T]he classical tradition recrudesced in early American public buildings, but it also flourished in the era of Beaux-Arts. Beginning in the mid to late 19th century, American Beaux-Arts architects were trained in France in the classical tradition, which they adapted for their era. Using modern construction techniques such as steel skeletons, they demonstrated that the classical tradition applied to a wide variety of building types, including at every level of scale—even the skyscraper. Magnificent Beaux-Arts public buildings in America including the Boston Public Library, the New York Public Library, and the campus of Columbia University.

The great American urban planner and architect Daniel Burnham said, “Make no little plans; they have no magic to stir men’s blood.” The Beaux-Arts revolution in America was jolted into existence in in 1893, when Burnham orchestrated the World’s Columbia Exhibition, also known as the Chicago World Fair. It was a collection of enormous temporary buildings with a common classical vocabulary arranged on a grand plan. The architecture was inspired by ancient precedents, but also those from the Renaissance and more recent French design. The plan incorporated vistas punctuated by symmetry, eye-catching monuments, axial avenues, uniform cornice heights, and harmonious ensembles of buildings. The so-called White City had a tremendous emotional and intellectual impact and changed American architecture and planning; the classical once again became the correct style for American political values. The exhibition launched the City Beautiful movement, a period in which it was thought that the design of cities—including monumental architecture, public art, and planning, especially the incorporation of public parks—could encourage civic virtue, including the virtue of the common man.

The first and foremost example of the City Beautiful movement was the 1901 Plan for Washington, D.C. known as the McMillan Plan, named after the Senator who instigated and oversaw it. The McMillan Plan restored and extended Pierre L’Enfant’s rational, orderly design for the city by creating the National Mall and surrounding monumental core as we know it. Indeed, the McMillan Plan is arguably the greatest work of civic art in the modern era.

Posted in civic architecture, classicism, McMillan Plan, public talks, Washington, D.C. | Leave a comment

Speaking at “A New Path for Beauty” Conference at the University of Cambridge

On September 7, 2024, I’ll be speaking at the University of Cambridge at a conference on “A New Path for Beauty: Shaping Tomorrow’s Institutions” sponsored by the Roger Scruton Legacy Foundation. (I serve on their Board of Advisors.) My topic is “How Classical Architecture Can Unite Americans in an Otherwise Divided Time.” The other speakers on the panel are the Right Honourable Michael Gove, former Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities in the U.K. cabinet, and architect María Sánchez. Moderated by Samuel Hughes. For information, see here

Posted in federal architecture, Maria Sanchez, public talks, Roger Scruton, Roger Scruton Legacy Foundation, Rt. Hon. Michael Gove, Samuel Hughes | Leave a comment

Video of My NatCon Talk: How We Turned the Tables on Modern Architectural Eyesores

On July 10, 2024, I gave a talk on “How We Turned the Tables on Modern Architectural Eyesores” at the National Conservatism conference in Washington, D.C.

I discussed policy regarding federal architecture, including President Trump’s Executive Order that re-oriented federal architecture from Modernism to classical and traditional design. I said:

Although the Executive Order was rescinded [by President Biden], it has led to a major welcome development. Thanks to the leadership of Senator Marco Rubio and Representative Jim Banks of Indiana, there is now pending in the House and Senate legislation titled the Beautifying Federal Civic Architecture Act. The legislation would essentially codify Trump’s Order and requires even more strongly the inclusion of public input. There are eight Senate co-sponsors so far, including J.D. Vance, Mike Lee, Roger Marshall, and Bill Hagerty. And there are eight co-sponsors in the House, including Elise Stefanik. Fox News gave the legislation good coverage, and Bloomberg reported, “what was once a fringe campaign to restore classical aesthetics has grown into a mainstream revolt.” Demonstrating its support for the legislation, The Wall Street Journal published an op-ed by my organization titled “Government Buildings Don’t Have to Be Ugly.”

There is still more momentous news. I just learned that the 2024 GOP platform states that “Republicans will promote beauty in Public Architecture and . . . build cherished symbols of our Nation.” The platform also calls for making Washington, D.C. the most beautiful capital city. But for Trump’s Executive Order, this never would have happened. 

You can watch the video of my talk here.

Posted in Americans' Preferred Architecture for Federal Buildings, federal architecture, federal architecture legislation, GSA's Design Excellence Program, Guiding Principles of Federal Architecture, uncategorized | Leave a comment

My Lecture on Ordinary People’s Preferences in Architecture

Justin Shubow speaks at the Beauty and Ugliness in Architecture conference in Oslo, Norway

In May 2024, I gave a talk on ordinary people’s preferences in architecture at a Beauty and Ugliness in Architecture conference in Oslo, Norway. Many members of the Arkitekturupproret (Architectural Uprising), a grassroots rebellion against Modernist architecture, were there.

In my lecture, I highlighted the National Civic Art Society / Harris Poll survey of 2,000 adults finding that nearly three-quarters of Americans (72%) – including majorities across political, racial/ethnic, gender, and socioeconomic lines – prefer traditional architecture for U.S. courthouses and federal office buildings. For a Bloomberg News story on the survey, see “Classical or Modern Architecture? For Americans, It’s No Contest.” 

You can watch the video of my talk HERE.

Posted in Americans' Preferred Architecture for Federal Buildings, Arkitekturupproret (Architectural Uprising), public talks | Leave a comment

Speaking About Roger Scruton’s Philosophy of Architecture

On May 19, 2024 at Georgetown University, I’ll be giving a talk on “Roger Scruton’s Philosophy of Architecture” at a conference on Scruton sponsored by the Center for American Culture and Ideas, the American Enterprise Institute, the Ethics & Public Policy Center, the National Civic Art Society, and others. You can register here. Below please find the abstract of my talk:

The leading philosopher of architecture of his time, Roger Scruton spent his life thinking and writing about the aesthetics of the built environment. He published such books as The Aesthetics of Architecture and The Classical Vernacular: Architectural Principles in an Age of Nihilism, along with numerous pieces of popular journalism on the subject. A staunch foe of Modernist architecture, Scruton argued for the superiority of the classical tradition, which he believed to be unparalleled in its capacity to produce beauty and harmony, and to make us feel at home in the world. Controversy exploded in Britain when he was appointed chairman of the UK government’s Building Better, Building Beautiful Commission, which addressed the poor design of homes and places. A similar controversy has erupted in recent years in America as both President Trump and Congress have promoted classical and traditional design for federal buildings and U.S. courthouses. This talk will survey Scruton’s ideas about architecture as well as how his followers should respond to recent events in America.

Posted in architecture, Building Better, Building Beautiful Commission, federal architecture, federal architecture legislation, public talks, Roger Scruton | Leave a comment

Speaking at a Conference in Oslo on Beauty and Ugliness in Architecture

I’m pleased to report that I’ll be giving a talk on ordinary people’s preferences in architecture at a conference in Oslo, Norway in May 2024. The theme of the conference is Beauty and Ugliness in Architecture. Other speakers include James Stevens Curl, Michael Diamant, Nikos Salingaros, Branko Mitrovic, and Nir Buras.

Posted in Americans' Preferred Architecture for Federal Buildings, federal architecture, GSA's Design Excellence Program, Guiding Principles of Federal Architecture, public talks | Leave a comment

Interviewed on Liberty Law Talk Podcast

Liberty Law Talk, a podcast of Law & Liberty, featured an interview of National Civic Art Society President Justin Shubow in which he talks about the influence of civic architecture on body politic, the role of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts (which he used to chair), the future of memorials, and more. 

You can listen to the podcast, which was published on November 20, 2023, or read the transcript HERE

To excerpt:

Justin Shubow: [T]he founders saw classical architecture as returning to the roots of democracy in Rome and Greece. So it made sense that they chose that architecture instead of, say, gothic or something else for the buildings of government. It’s interesting—in the 19th century, when the British Parliament was deciding what their new parliament building was going to look like, they had a competition, and the competition required that the building be either Gothic or what they called Elizabethan. There was opposition to having a classical parliament because people said that style was too Republican, meaning it was too anti-monarchical.

And so I think there is this long association in America tying classical architecture to democracy. And you look at certain structures like the U.S. Supreme Court, which is modeled on temple architecture with the steps leading up with the columns with the pediment. This is a classic American building type, the courthouse that everyone recognizes. It’s what you see on TV and in movies. And when people see that, I think they see a temple of justice. There’s something about the temple form that resonates.

[…]

[T]here are certain modernist architects who think of themselves as creative geniuses with emphasis on innovation and “creativity.” They don’t believe that emulating traditional architecture is something that should be done. A lot of them think that they just know better than ordinary people. Even if their designs are not appreciated by the public, they think that they are achieving the highest goals of architecture. And maybe someday, the public will be educated and come around to liking their designs. But of course, say Brutalism has been around for 60 years now, and it’s still widely disliked, and I don’t think it ever will be liked.

There is something about architecture schools that brainwash or deform architects’ minds. There is a study that the longer architects have been in school, the more their preferences diverge from that of laypeople. There was a separate study that found that not only do architects evaluate buildings in a different way from the public, but they can’t even predict how lay people will respond to their buildings. That’s how differently they think from lay people.

And it’s important to understand that a building is not like a painting on a wall or a piece of music. You can’t avoid it. Architecture is forced upon us, and so therefore it’s the most political of the arts, small p political. And when you get to public buildings, it’s explicitly political since these buildings are speaking to who we are and who we wish to be.

Posted in American Institute of Architects (AIA), Americans' Preferred Architecture for Federal Buildings, architecture, beauty, Brutalism, civic architecture, classicism, courthouses, deconstructionism, deconstructivism, federal architecture, federal architecture legislation, General Services Administration, George Washington, GSA's Design Excellence Program, Guiding Principles of Federal Architecture, Harris Poll, Jefferson Memorial, Modernism, monuments, National Civic Art Society, sculpture, Thom Mayne, Thomas Jefferson, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, ugliness, Washington, D.C. | Leave a comment